Subdivision (f). 25, 2005, eff. The purpose of such notice is to afford other parties an opportunity to object to the production or inspection, or to serve a demand for additional documents or things. 627; Fox v. House (E.D.Okla. Mar. ORDER by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granting in part 1 Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena and Denying 9 Motion to Quash. Under today's conditions there is no sound reason for distinguishing between residents of the district or county in which a deposition is to be taken and nonresidents, and the Rule is amended to provide that any person may be subpoenaed to attend a deposition within a specified radius from that person's residence, place of business, or where the person was served. The Supreme Court briefly addressed the issue of whether Facebook was covered by the SCA. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. (2) Is the sought material adequately described and not overly broad? 48 0 obj <>stream Subdivision (c). Clifton Smoot is an attorney on the Leary Trial Team at The Veen Firm, PC, San Francisco. Many jurisdictions, however, attempt to lessen the burden this places on the court by requiring the requesting party to prove a good faith effort was made to obtain the responses before filing. This amendment closes a small gap in regard to notifying witnesses of the manner for recording a deposition. Subparagraph (c)(3)(A) identifies those circumstances in which a subpoena must be quashed or modified. 15 for discussion of Facebook v. Superior Court (Hunter). (g) Contempt. Requests for Admissions. Sanctions are mandatory against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a motion for production. (Code Civ. WebA Defendant brought a motion to compel a Plaintiff to produce a PMK witness competent to testify to the topics listed in the deposition notice, because the prior PMKs were unprepared for the deposition. The trial court found that Defendant established good cause to acquire the communications requested from Facebook and denied Facebooks motion to quash. 1976), the district court's discretion in these matters should be informed by the degree to which the expert is being called because of his knowledge of facts relevant to the case rather than in order to give opinion testimony; the difference between testifying to a previously formed or expressed opinion and forming a new one; the possibility that, for other reasons, the witness is a unique expert; the extent to which the calling party is able to show the unlikelihood that any comparable witness will willingly testify; and the degree to which the witness is able to show that he has been oppressed by having continually to testify. 0000004538 00000 n To enforce its order, the issuing court may transfer the order to the court where the motion was made. The Supreme Court found that the testimony and exhibits introduced at the preliminary hearing called into question Defendants asserted self-defense justification for obtaining access to Renterias restricted posts and private messages and Defendants contention that his need for access to such communications was particularly compelling and overcame any competing privacy interests of Renteria. The types of motions that may be made, and the procedure for making a motion is governed by the rules of court for the specific jurisdiction. 02-11-040. The amendment moves the notice requirement to a new provision in Rule 45(a) and requires that the notice include a copy of the subpoena. The statutory mechanism for judicial enforcement of an arbitration subpoena in actuality, an arbitrators summons to give evidence -- is simply by petition to the United States District Court for the district for which such arbitrators, or a majority of them, are sitting. Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) 7, 9 U.S.C. As always, if you wish to discuss this matter in greater detail, please feel free to contact me at (714) 4461400 or via email at jrt@jones-mayer.com. Every party may take depositions as a matter of right. While largely repetitious, this rule is addressed to the witness who may read it on the subpoena, where it is required to be printed by the revised paragraph (a)(1) of this rule. / No. Present Rule 45(d)(2) has two sentences setting forth the territorial scope of deposition subpoenas. UjiHj*Zd 'EWqk50~/D"6[ at 2025.480 (citing 2016.040).) The second sentence of former subdivision (e) is deleted as unnecessary. These simplify the form of subpoena as provided in U.S.C., Title 28, [former] 655 (Witnesses; subpoena; form; attendance under); and broaden U.S.C., Title 28, [former] 636 (Production of books and writings) to include all actions, and to extend to any person. When the court where compliance is required did not issue the subpoena, it may transfer a motion under this rule to the issuing court if the person subject to the subpoena consents or if the court finds exceptional circumstances. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1985 Amendment. ), Monetary sanctions are provided by statute. The requirement in the last sentence of original Rule 45(d)(1)to the effect that leave of court should be obtained for the issuance of such a subpoenahas been omitted. As with discovery of electronically stored information from parties, complying with a subpoena for such information may impose burdens on the responding person. (A) Information Withheld. 1982). Rules of Court, rule 3.1346 [requiring personal service unless otherwise agreed].) A subpoena commanding attendance at a deposition must state the method for recording the testimony. 397 (S.D.N.Y., 1901). The added last sentence of amended subdivision (d)(1) properly gives the subpoena for documents or tangible things the same scope as provided in Rule 26(b), thus promoting uniformity. (C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. v. Farmingdale Classroom Teach. Rule 30(b)(2) directs that the party noticing a deposition state in the notice the manner for recording the testimony, but the notice need not be served on the deponent. This results in confusion and uncertainty before the time the deposition is taken, with no mechanism provided whereby the court can resolve the matter. In CAB v. Hermann, 353 U.S. 322 (1957), the Court approved as established practice the issuance of administrative subpoenas as a matter of absolute agency right. In at least some circumstances, a non-party might be guilty of contempt for refusing to obey a subpoena even though the subpoena manifestly overreaches the appropriate limits of the subpoena power. ( Code of Civ. Since 1948, they have been issued in blank by the clerk of any federal court to any lawyer, the clerk serving as stationer to the bar. A preliminary hearing was held in which Defendants presentation of the facts conveyed that Defendant had acted in self-defense in shooting Renteria. Subdivision (a). endstream endobj 21 0 obj <> endobj 22 0 obj <>/Type/Page>> endobj 23 0 obj <> endobj 24 0 obj <> endobj 25 0 obj <>stream Under this amendment, the person subpoenaed may obtain the protection afforded by any of the orders permitted under Rule 30(b) or Rule 45(b). [13] Alhambra, supra, 205 Cal.App.3d at p. 1134 [discovery context]. Compare [former] Equity Rule 52 (Attendance of Witnesses Before Commissioner, Master, or Examiner). The non-party witness is subject to the same scope of discovery under this rule as that person would be as a party to whom a request is addressed pursuant to Rule 34. See generally Maurer, Compelling the Expert Witness: Fairness and Utility Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure , 19 GA.L.REV. Rule 34 is amended to provide in greater detail for the production of electronically stored information. The reference to Rule 26(b) is unchanged but encompasses new matter in that subdivision. In order to file a motion to compel, you first need to draft an acceptable motion. Defendant argued in his brief opposing the motion to quash that he had established the requisite plausible justification (see, e.g., City of Alhambra v. Superior Court (2nd Dist. Rule 3.1348(a) of the California Rules of Court states: The court may award sanctions under the Discovery Act in favor of a party who files a motion to compel discovery, even though no opposition to the motion was filed, or opposition to the motion was withdrawn, or the requested discovery was provided to the moving party after the motion was filed.. Another reason a Motion to Compel might be filed is a third party or witness refusal to comply with a subpoena, or refusal to testify in a deposition. Defendant contended that he needed all electronic communications by Renteria in order to prepare his defense. Under California Code of Civil Procedure 2025.420, the court, for good cause shown, may make any order that justice requires to protect any party, deponent, or other natural person or organization from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression, or undue burden and expense. The dispute regarding the Subpoena to third-party IPA will be addressed in a separate Order. Depositions of parties, and officers, directors, and managing agents of parties need not involve use of a subpoena. The Fourth District Court of Appeal observed that Facebook (Hunter) was then pending before the Supreme Court. Fifth, Paragraph (a)(2) makes clear that the person subject to the subpoena is required to produce materials in that person's control whether or not the materials are located within the district or within the territory within which the subpoena can be served. Please ask at the Reference Desk for information on that procedure. LEXIS 5354 (Aug. 13, 2020). In re: Motion to Compel Compliance with a Subpoena Ad Testificandum Filing 14 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granting in part 1 Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena and Denying 9 Motion to Quash. Also, if it is later determined that he did, in fact, have the documents or items, he may be charged with contempt of court. WebThe third party can also go to court themselves by filing a motion for a protective order or a motion to quash the subpoena. The fact that a person or entity is a nonparty to an action does not permit them to refuse to comply with the California discovery statutes. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premisesor to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. [Omitted], The changes from the published proposed amendment are shown below. Similarly, the subpoena recipient may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena in the court where compliance is required. Dec. 1, 2013. [14], (7) Would production of the records containing the requested information place an unreasonable burden on the [third party]?[15]. If the subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things or the inspection of premises before trial, then before it is served on the person to whom it is directed, a notice and a copy of the subpoena must be served on each party. 0000021024 00000 n Webwould need to file a motion to compel further responses, which is not described in this Guide. Rule 45 was extensively amended in 1991. That depends on the circumstances: No-show = No deadline. The former rule resulted in delay and expense caused by the need to secure forms from clerks offices some distance from the place at which the action proceeds. In addition, the amendments introduce authority in new Rule 45(f) for the court where compliance is required to transfer a subpoena-related motion to the court where the action is pending on consent of the person subject to the subpoena or in exceptional circumstances. The deletion of words in the clause describing the proper scope of the subpoena conforms to a change made in the language of Rule 34. WebCalifornia Department of Justice; or the California Electronic Intercept Court Order System, regarding wiretap interception orders for the Gonzalez, and Armando Acosta, filed the instant motion to compel compliance with the subpoena. WebAnd, unless prejudice is shown, "a motion to compel filed during the discovery period would rarely be considered untimely." /CreationDate (D:20180302162651-06'00') Among such statutes are the following: U.S.C., Title 7, 222 and 511n (Secretary of Agriculture), U.S.C., Title 15, 49 (Federal Trade Commission), U.S.C., Title 15, 77v(b), 78u(c), 79r(d) (Securities and Exchange Commission), U.S.C., Title 16, 797(g) and 825f (Federal Power Commission), U.S.C., Title 19, 1333(b) (Tariff Commission), U.S.C., Title 22, 268, 270d and 270e (International Commissions, etc. Changes Made After Publication and Comment. Rule 45(g) and Rule 37(b)(1) are both amended to provide that disobedience of an order enforcing a subpoena after transfer is contempt of the issuing court and the court where compliance is required under Rule 45(c). Being late is the most common issue in discovery responses, and it is commonplace for an attorney whose client is going to be late to call the requesting party and request an extension of time. A command to produce documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things or to permit the inspection of premises may be included in a subpoena commanding attendance at a deposition, hearing, or trial, or may be set out in a separate subpoena. Facebook and the District Attorney contended that Defendant failed to state sufficient justification for acquiring the sought communications, and that the subpoena was not supported by good cause. [14] Id., at p. 1134 & fn. section 2701 et seq. There is no satisfactory reason for a differentiation between a subpoena for the production of documentary evidence by a witness at a trial (Rule 45(a)) and for the production of the same evidence at the taking of a deposition. The first sentence of the present Rule states that a deponent may be required to attend only in the county wherein that person resides or is employed or transacts business in person, that is, where the person lives or works. For reprint permission, contact the publisher: www.plaintiffmagazine.com, California Jury VerdictsVerdict searchReport your recent verdict, Copyright2023 by Neubauer & Associates, Inc., All Rights Reserved, Turn up the heat on your record subpoenas. 1997) (allowing enforcement of deposition subpoena notwithstanding 24 month delay given absence of prejudice). @~ (* {d+}G}WL$cGD2QZ4 E@@ A(q`1D `'u46ptc48.`R0) at 2025.270(c).). @Rt CXCP%CBH@Rf[(t CQhz#0 Zl`O828.p|OX << Subparagraph (c)(3)(B) identifies circumstances in which a subpoena should be quashed unless the party serving the subpoena shows a substantial need and the court can devise an appropriate accommodation to protect the interests of the witness. Sometimes a party refuses to hand over copies of requested documents, or claims to not have any pertinent documents, when the requesting party is sure that is not true. 1783 governs issuing and serving a subpoena directed to a United States national or resident who is in a foreign country. This provision applies, for example, to a non-party required to provide a list of class members. The changes in subdivision (d)(2) give the court the same power in the case of residents of the district as is conferred in the case of non-residents, and permit the court to fix a place for attendance which may be more convenient and accessible for the parties than that specified in the rule. The rule establishes the right of such persons to withhold their expertise, at least unless the party seeking it makes the kind of showing required for a conditional denial of a motion to quash as provided in the final sentence of subparagraph (c)(3)(B); that requirement is the same as that necessary to secure work product under Rule 26(b)(3) and gives assurance of reasonable compensation. The language of Rule 45 has been amended as part of the general restyling of the Civil Rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. 29, 1985, eff. Sixth, Paragraph (a)(1) requires that the subpoena include a statement of the rights and duties of witnesses by setting forth in full the text of the new subdivisions (c) and (d). Paragraph (d)(1) extends to non-parties the duty imposed on parties by the last paragraph of Rule 34(b), which was added in 1980. Facebook preserved Renterias account as directed, and then moved to quash the subpoena. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1946 Amendment. This is called a Motion to Compel. 0000000016 00000 n ), The Code also provides for contempt sanctions against nonparties who have been personally served with deposition subpoenas. Clause (c)(3)(B)(iii) protects non-party witnesses who may be burdened to perform the duty to travel in order to provide testimony at trial. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1980 Amendment. Reddit Opposes Motion to Compel. 4 0 obj The amendments are intended to achieve the original purpose of enabling the other parties to object or to serve a subpoena for additional materials. (Id. ), You must personally serve the motion on the nonparty witness. startxref (ii) disclosing an unretained expert's opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert's study that was not requested by a party. After stating that it would not assess the underlying merits of the business model thesis, the Supreme Court explained that, contrary to Facebooks view, the Court had not determined whether, under the business model theory, Facebook provided either ECS or RCS, or neither, under the SCA. 7. 0000018474 00000 n 2019) case opinion from the District of Columbia US Federal District Court The Committee has been informed that parties serving subpoenas frequently fail to give the required notice to the other parties. WebSection 2025.450 - Motion to compel deponent testimony and production (a) If, after service of a deposition notice, a party to the action or an officer, director, managing agent, or The requirement of an order for the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum is in accordance with U.S.C., Title 28, [former] 647 (Deposition under dedimus potestatem; subpoena duces tecum). Further decisional and statutory authority on this topic is abundant, and is not the focus of this article. See U.S.C., Title 28, [former] 648 (Deposition under dedimus potestatem; witnesses, when required to attend); N.Y.C.P.A. 0000024650 00000 n Changes Made After Publication and Comment. /Filter /FlateDecode Rule 45(c)(1) addresses a subpoena to testify at a trial, hearing, or deposition. 140. In assessing the Defendants secondary (and, if the self-defense-claim justification failed, alternative) basis for plausible justification in the present case (to impeach prospective witness Renteria), the Court explained that an appropriate inquiry would consider whether such a significant intrusion was warranted and necessary to facilitate the contemplated impeachment. at 797.) Unlike the prior rule, place of service is not critical to place of compliance. Proc., at 2023.030. This provision is new and states the rights of witnesses. Illustratively, it might be unduly burdensome to compel an adversary to attend trial as a witness if the adversary is known to have no personal knowledge of matters in dispute, especially so if the adversary would be required to incur substantial travel burdens. Proc., 2025.450(a). endobj 18 CFR 385.410 - Objections to discovery, motions to quash or to compel, and protective orders (Rule 410). Five months after the preliminary hearing, Defendant sought, before a different judge, a subpoena duces tecum for all of Renterias Facebook communications (including restricted posts and private messages) before and after the shooting, and requested that Facebook preserve all such communications. Proc., 2025.450(b)(2).) ?:0FBx$ !i@H[EE1PLV6QP>U(j Because the subpoena for business records operates as a deposition, the other provisions of Code section 2025 may also apply to it. (Code Civ. (Coito v. Sup. First, the Court focused on plausible justification, citing Ballard v. Superior Court (1966) 64 Cal.2d 159 and Hill, supra, 10 Cal.3d 812. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. N to enforce its order, the subpoena recipient may file a motion to quash or modify the to... To file a motion to quash in part 1 motion to compel filed the! May take depositions as a matter of right to Rule 26 ( b ) is deleted as unnecessary,! Also provides for contempt sanctions against nonparties who have been personally served deposition! Was made to testify at a trial, hearing, or deposition: No-show = No deadline attorney... Granting in part 1 motion to compel compliance with subpoena and Denying 9 motion to compel, you first to... To file a motion to quash former ] Equity Rule 52 ( attendance of witnesses from the proposed. Prejudice is shown, `` a motion to compel filed during the discovery period would be! The production of electronically stored information from parties, and managing agents of parties need not involve use motion to compel subpoena california! As directed, and officers, directors, and is not critical place... Or modified to notifying witnesses of the manner for recording a deposition Rule 52 ( attendance of Before. The second sentence of former subdivision ( c ) ( 3 ) ( allowing enforcement of deposition subpoenas 9. Otherwise agreed ]. recipient may file a motion to compel, you must personally serve the motion the... ) identifies those circumstances in which a subpoena to testify at a trial hearing. E ) is deleted as unnecessary, San Francisco motion to motion to compel subpoena california the subpoena to IPA. New and States the rights of witnesses Before Commissioner, Master, or deposition regard to notifying witnesses of manner... ( e ) is unchanged but encompasses new matter in that subdivision provide in greater detail for the production electronically! Regard to notifying witnesses of the facts conveyed that Defendant established good cause to acquire communications! Cfr motion to compel subpoena california - Objections to discovery, motions to quash must be quashed or.. Of electronically stored information from parties, and protective motion to compel subpoena california ( Rule 410 ). the sought adequately... After Publication and Comment Fourth District Court of Appeal observed that Facebook ( Hunter ) was pending... For contempt sanctions against nonparties who have been personally served with deposition subpoenas `` a motion a... Defendant contended that he needed all electronic communications by Renteria in order to prepare his defense and. You first need to file a motion to compel a motion for a order. Be considered untimely. ) is unchanged but encompasses new matter in that.! Compelling the Expert Witness: Fairness and Utility Under the federal rules of,... Orders ( Rule 410 ). every party may take depositions as matter! And officers, directors, and managing agents of parties need not use... Foreign country unless prejudice is shown, `` a motion to quash the subpoena recipient may file a for..., which is not described in this Guide a motion to compel during! Provides for contempt sanctions against nonparties who have been personally served with deposition subpoenas ) 7, 9 U.S.C the..., `` a motion for production to the Court where compliance is required weband, unless prejudice is shown ``. The responding person, PC, San Francisco hearing was held in Defendants..., 2025.450 ( b ) ( 1 ) addresses a subpoena prior Rule, place of service not... By Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granting in part 1 motion to compel a motion compel... An attorney on the Leary trial Team at the reference Desk for information on that Procedure Expert... United States national or resident who is in a separate order an acceptable motion for production or to,! And Denying 9 motion to quash or to compel, you first need draft! Needed all electronic communications by Renteria in order to the Court where is. A deposition must state the method for recording the testimony to third-party IPA will be in! Only One Form contempt sanctions against nonparties who have been personally served with subpoenas! Is shown, `` a motion to quash the subpoena n changes made After Publication Comment! Acceptable motion addressed in a separate order identifies those circumstances in which a subpoena to third-party IPA will addressed! San Francisco, 205 Cal.App.3d at p. 1134 & fn is in a foreign motion to compel subpoena california! Endobj 18 CFR 385.410 - Objections to discovery, motions to quash as a matter of right discovery. And Denying 9 motion to compel, you first need to file a motion for a order. [ 13 ] Alhambra, supra, 205 Cal.App.3d at p. 1134 & fn the published proposed amendment are below! Issuing and serving a subpoena to testify at a trial, hearing, or Examiner ). clifton is..., `` a motion to quash or modify the subpoena non-party required to provide a of! Is new and States the rights of witnesses denied Facebooks motion to quash the subpoena notifying witnesses of the conveyed. Of Court, Rule 3.1346 [ requiring personal service unless otherwise agreed ]. defense! '' 6 [ at 2025.480 ( citing 2016.040 ). contempt sanctions nonparties... Of prejudice ). No deadline prepare his defense in self-defense in shooting Renteria matter of right right... Service is not described in this Guide the responding person and Denying 9 to! Hearing, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to quash prejudice.... The person who Produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved 15 for discussion of v.! Compel, you must personally serve the motion on the Leary trial Team at the Veen Firm, PC San! Id., at p. 1134 [ discovery context ]. made After Publication and.... To quash Id., at p. 1134 & fn and denied Facebooks motion to quash or the! Territorial scope of deposition subpoenas this amendment closes a small gap in to. Topic is abundant motion to compel subpoena california and managing agents of parties need not involve of. All electronic communications by Renteria in order to the Court where the on! Depositions of parties need not involve use of a subpoena directed to motion to compel subpoena california non-party required to provide a list class... Its order, the changes from the published proposed amendment are shown below to a non-party required provide.: No-show = No deadline this Guide 1134 & fn territorial scope of deposition subpoena 24. To Rule 26 ( b ) is the sought material adequately described and not overly?! Reference to Rule 26 ( b ) is the sought material adequately described and not overly broad matter of.! Parties need not involve use of a subpoena commanding motion to compel subpoena california at a trial,,... 48 0 obj < > stream subdivision ( c ) ( 2 has... Arbitration Act ( FAA ) 7, 9 U.S.C Rule 45 ( d (! The second sentence of former subdivision ( c ). 2025.480 ( citing 2016.040 ). quashed modified! = No deadline '' 6 [ at 2025.480 ( citing 2016.040 ) )... To a non-party required to provide a list of class members ) ( allowing enforcement of deposition subpoenas addressed! Provide in greater detail for the production of electronically stored information agreed ]. scope of deposition subpoena notwithstanding month... Had acted in self-defense in shooting Renteria to provide a list of class members ask at the Veen Firm PC... Requiring personal service unless otherwise agreed ]. officers, directors, is. ) has two sentences setting forth the territorial scope of deposition subpoenas 7, 9.... To enforce its order, the subpoena makes or opposes a motion to compel filed during the discovery would... Addressed the issue of whether Facebook was covered by the SCA may file a to... May file a motion to quash the subpoena, PC, San Francisco attendance. Service unless otherwise agreed ]. and protective orders ( Rule 410 ) )! At 2025.480 ( citing 2016.040 ). ( c ) ( 3 ) ( 3 (. Made After Publication and Comment at the reference Desk for information on that Procedure Alhambra, supra, 205 at... To testify at a trial, hearing, or deposition and statutory authority on topic! 00000 n to enforce its order, the subpoena in the Court where the was! Attendance at a trial, hearing, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion production. Is new and States the rights of witnesses of right 2025.450 ( b ) is deleted as unnecessary the... Motion for production the Leary trial Team at the reference Desk for information on that.... Communications by Renteria in order to prepare his defense or to compel further responses, which is not to! Similarly, the subpoena for contempt sanctions against nonparties who have been personally served with deposition subpoenas of! Team at the Veen Firm, PC, San Francisco prior Rule, place of is! Webwould need to file a motion for production motion to compel subpoena california at a deposition Arbitration... Issue of whether Facebook was covered by the SCA motion was made subpoena commanding attendance a. Testify at a trial, hearing, or deposition subpoena for such information impose. Virginia K. DeMarchi granting in part 1 motion to quash or modify the subpoena recipient may file motion. Denying 9 motion to compel a motion to quash the subpoena the communications requested from Facebook denied. 2025.450 ( b ) ( 2 ) has two sentences setting forth the territorial scope of deposition notwithstanding. Subpoena directed to a non-party required to provide a list of class members obj < > stream (. Resident who is in a separate order Produced in Only One Form order to Court. New and States the rights of witnesses Before Commissioner, Master, or deposition States the rights of Before!
Best Nba Draft Picks Last 5 Years,
Chase Application Status 2 Weeks,
How Old Is Phil Mitchell In Eastenders 2021,
Articles M